Comments on: Litespeed webserver

By: bobinson

bobinson — Thu, 16 Apr 2009 14:04:38 +0000

Go ahead ! its recommended. Also thanks for the tip. I was wondering how did you get the info so easily.

By: timbury

timbury — Thu, 16 Apr 2009 12:33:28 +0000

Thanks for the clarification. I think I’ll try nginx on my own server. Btw, for the admin, I’m using the Domain Details Firefox plug-in.

By: bobinson

bobinson — Wed, 15 Apr 2009 06:55:15 +0000

@admin We had tried litespeed too. But finally decided to go ahead with Nginx

By: bobinson

bobinson — Wed, 15 Apr 2009 06:54:26 +0000

@@timbury Yes we are running Nginx on our all our web servers. We have integrated Nginx and Cpanel and since our benchmarks are showing much better performanace for Nginx-Cpanel than Apache-Cpanel we are now using Nginx as our default web server.

By: admin

admin — Wed, 15 Apr 2009 06:30:24 +0000

Have you installed nginx as webserver ? Litespeed is no way related to nginx.

Can you elaborate more on when and how you are getting this server headers.

By: timbury

timbury — Wed, 15 Apr 2009 06:15:36 +0000

Just wondering why I’m getting these server headers, which seem to indicate ngine-X usage:

Server: nginx/0.6.35
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 06:12:50 GMT
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Transfer-Encoding: chunked
Connection: keep-alive
Keep-Alive: timeout=10
X-Powered-By: PHP/5.2.8